Senin, 24 Februari 2014

[smf_addin] Digest Number 2979[1 Attachment]

10 Messages

Digest #2979
1a
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "Sharon McAllister" sharonnraymc
1b
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "Kermit W. Prather" kermitpra
1c
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "PC_BABE" cs.holdings
1d
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "nautilustech@yahoo.com" nautilustech
1e
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "Randy Harmelink" rharmelink
1f
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "T Shepherd" tonybshepherd
1g
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "T Shepherd" tonybshepherd
1h
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "Pete A" option2z
1i
Re: Possible SMF Web Site? by "Pete A" option2z

Messages

Sun Feb 23, 2014 9:59 am (PST) . Posted by:

"Sharon McAllister" sharonnraymc

Hi Randy, I attached snapshots of what I see with Chrome on Win7. I can download files from each of the links. Thank you for your continued efforts and support for such a terrific tool.

-- Sharon

________________________________
From: Randy Harmelink <rharmelink@gmail.com>
To: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:06 AM
Subject: [smf_addin] Possible SMF Web Site?


 
Because I've been unhappy with the last few FILES area updates for Yahoo groups, I'm trying to decide if I should put a rudimentary replacement on the Internet.

I'm curious what people see with these:

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html

Are they the same? Can you even access them?

It looks like I could change my hosting plan and get unlimited bandwidth easily. So it might even be possible to have the element definitions online for automatic updates. I don't know if that adds more danger or convenience.

Attachment(s) from Sharon McAllister
1 of 1 Photo(s)

Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:52 am (PST) . Posted by:

"Kermit W. Prather" kermitpra

I don't see much difference between this and the yahoo group. I am not a big fan of yahoo's new groups layout and screens. Tough on us old folks to read.

My biggest problem with the content in the yahoo group files is that obsolete files are left there for years.

I'm really okay with either. Hopefully it will be one or the other but not both. Would be a nightmare for you to keep in sink.

You already do too much for us lazy users.

Kermit

From: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com [mailto:smf_addin@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Randy Harmelink
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:06 AM
To: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [smf_addin] Possible SMF Web Site?


Because I've been unhappy with the last few FILES area updates for Yahoo groups, I'm trying to decide if I should put a rudimentary replacement on the Internet.

I'm curious what people see with these:

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html

Are they the same? Can you even access them?
It looks like I could change my hosting plan and get unlimited bandwidth easily. So it might even be possible to have the element definitions online for automatic updates. I don't know if that adds more danger or convenience.

Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:13 am (PST) . Posted by:

"PC_BABE" cs.holdings

Links & folders work fine. They appear differently. No pop ups. I use excel 2013 & win 8

From: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com [mailto:smf_addin@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Randy Harmelink
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:06 AM
To: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [smf_addin] Possible SMF Web Site?

Because I've been unhappy with the last few FILES area updates for Yahoo groups, I'm trying to decide if I should put a rudimentary replacement on the Internet.

I'm curious what people see with these:

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html

Are they the same? Can you even access them?

It looks like I could change my hosting plan and get unlimited bandwidth easily. So it might even be possible to have the element definitions online for automatic updates. I don't know if that adds more danger or convenience.

Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:13 pm (PST) . Posted by:

"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink

Several advantages to a website:

1. I can have direct links to the files and documentation.

2. I can organize the listings any way I want, even listing files in
multiple places (e.g. "Yahoo" templates)

3. When you use a file from the Yahoo group, it's downloaded first to your
computer, and then the local copy is opened. In Firefox, that can require
one or more confirmation boxes where "OK" needs to be clicked before a file
is opened. I find that a pain with the Documentation files. A minor issue,
I know. But annoying, nonetheless.

4. I can add back usable file descriptions

5. I may be able to access the element definitions directly from the web,
so there can be auto updates

For now, the question is how I want to organize the web pages. I'll
actually store the data in a workbook and have EXCEL generate the web pages.

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kermit W. Prather <kermitp@tampabay.rr.com
> wrote:

>
> I don't see much difference between this and the yahoo group. I am not a
> big fan of yahoo's new groups layout and screens. Tough on us old folks to
> read.
>
>
>
> My biggest problem with the content in the yahoo group files is that
> obsolete files are left there for years.
>
>
>
> I'm really okay with either. Hopefully it will be one or the other but not
> both. Would be a nightmare for you to keep in sink.
>
>
>
> You already do too much for us lazy users.
>

Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:14 pm (PST) . Posted by:

"T Shepherd" tonybshepherd

Hi - both accessible here. First one also shows works in progress folder. HTH - tbs

>________________________________
> From: Randy Harmelink <rharmelink@gmail.com>
>To: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:06 AM
>Subject: [smf_addin] Possible SMF Web Site?
>
>
>

>Because I've been unhappy with the last few FILES area updates for Yahoo groups, I'm trying to decide if I should put a rudimentary replacement on the Internet.
>
>I'm curious what people see with these:
>
>http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/
>
>http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html
>
>Are they the same? Can you even access them?
>
>It looks like I could change my hosting plan and get unlimited bandwidth easily. So it might even be possible to have the element definitions online for automatic updates. I don't know if that adds more danger or convenience.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:36 pm (PST) . Posted by:

"T Shepherd" tonybshepherd

Hi - me again :) Win XP Pro SP3 / FF 27.0.1 w/ extensive addin's. Forgot to mention before that hover boxes worked - and done properly, they are helpful.
1) yes 2) yes 3) Sometimes - for me, PDF's can be opened "one-click&quot;. 4) Yes, and perhaps even a search of descriptions. 5) Yes - but don't let those overwhelm your site. Perhaps only permit weekly updates? Perhaps only if content changes?
HTH- worth what you paid - YMMV etc. - tbs

>________________________________
> From: Randy Harmelink <rharmelink@gmail.com>
>To: smf_addin@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [smf_addin] Possible SMF Web Site?
>
>
>

>Several advantages to a website:
>
>1. I can have direct links to the files and documentation.
>
>2. I can organize the listings any way I want, even listing files in multiple places (e.g. "Yahoo" templates)
>
>3. When you use a file from the Yahoo group, it's downloaded first to your computer, and then the local copy is opened. In Firefox, that can require one or more confirmation boxes where "OK" needs to be clicked before a file is opened. I find that a pain with the Documentation files. A minor issue, I know. But annoying, nonetheless.
>
>4. I can add back usable file descriptions
>
>5. I may be able to access the element definitions directly from the web, so there can be auto updates
>
>For now, the question is how I want to organize the web pages. I'll actually store the data in a workbook and have EXCEL generate the web pages.
>
>
>
>On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kermit W. Prather <kermitp@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I don't see much difference between this and the yahoo group.  I am not a big fan of yahoo's new groups layout and screens. Tough on us old folks to read.
>> 
>>My biggest problem with the content in the yahoo group files is that obsolete files are left there for years.
>> 
>>I'm really okay with either. Hopefully it will be one or the other but not both.  Would be a nightmare for you to keep in sink.
>> 
>>You already do too much for us lazy users.
>>
>
>
>
>

Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:42 pm (PST) . Posted by:

"Pete A" option2z

RE: Were the popup boxes useful on the Documentation and Template pages?

Each opened a properly formatted single web page in the SAME browser window
(would be better, to me, if it opened in a new tab or a new window).


Pete A
<http://www.ttp-s.com/php/toolsmenu.php>


Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:10 am (PST) . Posted by:

"Pete A" option2z

Hi Randy,
Agreed that YAHOO has broken itself. Much prefer either of your solutions
to YAHOO's awkward new interface.
RE:
"http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html

Are they the same? Can you even access them?"

I can access each of them, using IE 10.0
Also with latest Chrome
Also with FireFox

Here's what I see (pretty much the same with them all)
http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/:
This one is a browser's view of an FTP file structure. Works ok, but a bit
more awkward than the _index.html. I'd bet that the FTP version would take
a lot less effort on your part, and works fine for my purposes.

http://www.ogres-crypt.com/SMF/_index.html:
Quick, and nice to access but not enough better to put much effort into
(IMHO)>

Thanks for all you do! I'm glad to test anything you want tested on Windows
8 using all three of the named browsers.


Pete A
<http://www.ttp-s.com/php/toolsmenu.php>


Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:19 am (PST) . Posted by:

marshall17043


Found it! In the Trust Center, under Add-ins, the "Require Application Add-ins to be signed by Trusted Publisher" checkbox was checked. Thanks!

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar