Jumat, 17 Oktober 2014

[smf_addin] Digest Number 3210[1 Attachment]

6 Messages

Digest #3210

Messages

Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:42 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

analyst101010

Hello Randy and everyone,

One of my templates has a couple of the Barchart.com technical indicator averages featured... comparing the composite short-term indicators relative to composite mid-term indicators, and overall indicator averages.

These are Element Numbers 703 & 709 & 702, respectively

I had recently updated some of the newest element definition files from the "Works in Progress", and noticed that the way these stats are now reported in the sheet is as an overall "Sell" or "Buy"....

....whereas previously, the composite averages would be reported as a % strength indicator as well.... e.g. "50% Sell" or "25% Buy"

I went back to the older definition files (2/2014), and it was fine again.

Any thoughts? Am i not doing the correct thing in just over-writing the old definition files? Should I be using the entire Beta version of the add-in for the newer features?

Thanks
JG

Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:13 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink

You just need a new copy of the template. The "50% Buy" was split into two
different elements, one for the "50%" and one for the "Buy".

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, jfgilmore@gmail.com [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
> One of my templates has a couple of the Barchart.com technical indicator
> averages featured... comparing the composite short-term indicators relative
> to composite mid-term indicators, and overall indicator averages.
>
> These are Element Numbers 703 & 709 & 702, respectively
>
> I had recently updated some of the newest element definition files from
> the "Works in Progress", and noticed that the way these stats are now
> reported in the sheet is as an overall "Sell" or "Buy"....
>
> ....whereas previously, the composite averages would be reported as a %
> strength indicator as well.... e.g. "50% Sell" or "25% Buy"
>
> I went back to the older definition files (2/2014), and it was fine again.
>
> Any thoughts? Am i not doing the correct thing in just over-writing the
> old definition files? Should I be using the entire Beta version of the
> add-in for the newer features?
>

Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:47 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

analyst101010

Thanks

as a side note = any insight into how to to pull down Morningstar Total Return data for individual stocks?

Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:40 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink

The various returns pages from MorningStar:

http://performance.morningstar.com/Performance/stock/trailing-total-returns.action?align=d&t=MMM

http://performance.morningstar.com/Performance/fund/historical-returns.action?align=m&y=15&freq=m&t=MMM
http://performance.morningstar.com/Performance/fund/historical-returns.action?align=m&y=15&freq=q&t=MMM

http://performance.morningstar.com/Performance/stock/performance-history-1.action?ndec=2&align=d&t=MMM

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:47 PM, jfgilmore@gmail.com [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
> as a side note = any insight into how to to pull down Morningstar Total
> Return data for individual stocks?
>

Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:32 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

roesterling

Randy,
The following MSN Reference Numbers have stopped working.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
See the attached Excel file.
Source MSN MSN MSN MSN MSN MSN Reference # 51 132 135 34 33 1
Attachment(s) from
1 of 1 File(s)

Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:43 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink

See:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/smf_addin/conversations/messages/27031

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:32 PM, roesterling@... wrote:

> The following MSN Reference Numbers have stopped working.
>
> Thank you for your time and assistance.
>
> See the attached Excel file.
> Source MSN MSN MSN MSN MSN MSN Reference # 51 132 135 34 33
>
> 1
>
>
>
For the Add-in, Documentation, Templates, Tips and FAQs, visit http://ogres-crypt.com/SMF

Tidak ada komentar:

Poskan Komentar