5 Messages
Digest #3408
Messages
Thu May 14, 2015 11:23 am (PDT) . Posted by:
millerd1_smf
Randy,
I'm an old time enthusiast of your work ethics and work products. I see your Oct 2006 post where you are saying you had worked up an ATR, but do not see any in the current Zip documents?
I am evaluating about 90 past equity trades. To do this I need a direct historical ATR data call (not requiring a download of 20-30 days pricing data for each equity I am trying to evaluate). Or candlestick Doji pattern call where I can control the acceptable O-C width of the Doji.
Have I missed a direct ATR or Doji function call somewhere?
Don Miller (Millerd1)
I'm an old time enthusiast of your work ethics and work products. I see your Oct 2006 post where you are saying you had worked up an ATR, but do not see any in the current Zip documents?
I am evaluating about 90 past equity trades. To do this I need a direct historical ATR data call (not requiring a download of 20-30 days pricing data for each equity I am trying to evaluate). Or candlestick Doji pattern call where I can control the acceptable O-C width of the Doji.
Have I missed a direct ATR or Doji function call somewhere?
Don Miller (Millerd1)
Thu May 14, 2015 1:51 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink
The smfTech() function does allow for ATR, either with or without a
separate download of historical data. See the documentation of the function
on the add-in web site for an example.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, millerd1_airmail_net@yahoo.com
[smf_addin] <smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> I'm an old time enthusiast of your work ethics and work products. I
> see your Oct 2006 post where you are saying you had worked up an ATR, but
> do not see any in the current Zip documents?
>
> I am evaluating about 90 past equity trades. To do this I need a direct
> historical ATR data call (not requiring a download of 20-30 days pricing
> data for each equity I am trying to evaluate). Or candlestick Doji pattern
> call where I can control the acceptable O-C width of the Doji.
>
> Have I missed a direct ATR or Doji function call somewhere?
>
>
separate download of historical data. See the documentation of the function
on the add-in web site for an example.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, millerd1_airmail_net@yahoo.com
[smf_addin] <smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> I'm an old time enthusiast of your work ethics and work products. I
> see your Oct 2006 post where you are saying you had worked up an ATR, but
> do not see any in the current Zip documents?
>
> I am evaluating about 90 past equity trades. To do this I need a direct
> historical ATR data call (not requiring a download of 20-30 days pricing
> data for each equity I am trying to evaluate). Or candlestick Doji pattern
> call where I can control the acceptable O-C width of the Doji.
>
> Have I missed a direct ATR or Doji function call somewhere?
>
>
Thu May 14, 2015 7:47 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
hjreed@swbell.net
Randy
You have always been good to give us explanations, so I'm asking for your expertise.
The smf functions can only report the data that is shown on various data sources. I'm calculating Force Index (using smfTech to pull multiple days data), which is Volume sensitive and have found several large errors in Yahoo (i.e. 5mm share differences) than NASDAQ and StockCharts (which are usually just a few k different).
My question is why is Volume so different between all these different sites?
I've tried to pull NASDAQ data, but your reply in "28394Re: [smf_addin] Retrieving historical .xls data file from nasdaq.com" is spot on. Zack's seems to have changed their interface. I'm pulling just Volume from Google as it is closer to the others, but is sequenced in ascending order rather than descending order. I'm using smfConvertData and smfGetTagContent (which are nice additions to the smf functions - Thank you!)
Do you use volume in any of your calculations and if so, which have you found to be most reliable?
-or-
Is there a way to extract D/O/H/L/C/V in descending sequence from Google similar to RCHGetYahooHistory?
Thank you!
Thu May 14, 2015 11:08 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink
I haven't a clue as to why they would be different -- after hours
included/excluded maybe? I don't use volume, and actually don't use
historical quotes that much either. I tend to go to StockCharts if I want a
chart.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hjreed@swbell.net [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Randy
>
> You have always been good to give us explanations, so I'm asking for your
> expertise.
>
>
> The smf functions can only report the data that is shown on various data
> sources. I'm calculating Force Index (using smfTech to pull multiple days
> data), which is Volume sensitive and have found several large errors in
> Yahoo (i.e. 5mm share differences) than NASDAQ and StockCharts (which are
> usually just a few k different).
>
>
> My question is why is Volume so different between all these different
> sites?
>
>
> I've tried to pull NASDAQ data, but your reply in "28394Re: [smf_addin]
> Retrieving historical .xls data file from nasdaq.com" is spot on. Zack's
> seems to have changed their interface. I'm pulling just Volume from Google
> as it is closer to the others, but is sequenced in ascending order rather
> than descending order. I'm using smfConvertData and smfGetTagContent
> (which are nice additions to the smf functions - Thank you!)
>
>
> Do you use volume in any of your calculations and if so, which have you
> found to be most reliable?
>
> -or-
>
> Is there a way to extract D/O/H/L/C/V in descending sequence from Google
> similar to RCHGetYahooHistory?
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>
included/excluded maybe? I don't use volume, and actually don't use
historical quotes that much either. I tend to go to StockCharts if I want a
chart.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hjreed@swbell.net [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Randy
>
> You have always been good to give us explanations, so I'm asking for your
> expertise.
>
>
> The smf functions can only report the data that is shown on various data
> sources. I'm calculating Force Index (using smfTech to pull multiple days
> data), which is Volume sensitive and have found several large errors in
> Yahoo (i.e. 5mm share differences) than NASDAQ and StockCharts (which are
> usually just a few k different).
>
>
> My question is why is Volume so different between all these different
> sites?
>
>
> I've tried to pull NASDAQ data, but your reply in "28394Re: [smf_addin]
> Retrieving historical .xls data file from nasdaq.com" is spot on. Zack's
> seems to have changed their interface. I'm pulling just Volume from Google
> as it is closer to the others, but is sequenced in ascending order rather
> than descending order. I'm using smfConvertData and smfGetTagContent
> (which are nice additions to the smf functions - Thank you!)
>
>
> Do you use volume in any of your calculations and if so, which have you
> found to be most reliable?
>
> -or-
>
> Is there a way to extract D/O/H/L/C/V in descending sequence from Google
> similar to RCHGetYahooHistory?
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>
Thu May 14, 2015 11:11 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
"Randy Harmelink" rharmelink
You could retrieve it in one range, then reverse it in another range. The
OFFSET() function is helpful for such things.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hjreed@swbell.net [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to extract D/O/H/L/C/V in descending sequence from Google
> similar to RCHGetYahooHistory?
>
OFFSET() function is helpful for such things.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hjreed@swbell.net [smf_addin] <
smf_addin@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to extract D/O/H/L/C/V in descending sequence from Google
> similar to RCHGetYahooHistory?
>
For the Add-in, Documentation, Templates, Tips and FAQs, visit http://ogres-crypt.com/SMF
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar